REBUILDING READING FOUNDATIONS: EXPLORING TEACHERS’ LIVED EXPERIENCES AND INSTRUCTIONAL ADAPTATIONS IN IMPLEMENTING THE ARAL-READING PROGRAM AMONG GRADES 4–6 LEARNERS

Authors

  • Adelyn Baloc • Department of Education - Piwong Elementary School Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/xhqpp479

Keywords:

ARAL-Reading Program; Filipino literacy; Grades 4–6; instructional adaptations; learning recovery; phenomenology; reading intervention; teachers' lived experiences

Abstract

The Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL)-Reading Program was established to address foundational literacy gaps among Filipino learners through targeted and responsive reading interventions. This study was designed to explore teachers' lived experiences, instructional challenges, adaptive strategies, and professional insights in implementing ARAL-Reading among Grades 4–6 learners in Hingyon, Ifugao, Philippines. The investigation adopted a qualitative research design grounded in Moustakas' (1994) transcendental phenomenology. Teachers with direct experience implementing ARAL-Reading were identified through purposive sampling, and the proposed data collection involved semi-structured interviews exploring reading difficulties, instructional differentiation, classroom experiences, and institutional support. The analytical framework comprised phenomenological reduction, horizonalization, clustering of meaning units, imaginative variation, and synthesis of textural and structural descriptions. Five analytical domains were developed from the research questions and relevant literature: addressing diverse reading deficiencies, adapting instruction to individual literacy needs, navigating implementation constraints, strengthening collaborative literacy support, and developing professional resilience and instructional competence. These domains provided a framework for examining the relationship between reading remediation and teachers' pedagogical decision-making. The study underscored the importance of investigating how educators interpreted and responded to literacy recovery demands in geographically and linguistically distinctive school contexts. Actual empirical findings and the final phenomenological essence remained dependent on the verified interview data.

References

Carreon, R. M. A., Iglesias, J.-A. S., Trinidad, A. E., & Orio, A. C. (2026). Grade 2 teachers' lived experiences in the ARAL Reading Program: A qualitative phenomenological study. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 52(6), 701–725. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2026/v52i63128

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://doi.org/10.54300/122.311

Department of Education. (2025). Implementing guidelines for the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program in Reading for Key Stages 1 to 3 (DepEd Memorandum No. 064, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2025_064r.pdf

Department of Education. (2025b). Implementing guidelines for the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program in Reading for Key Stages 1 to 3 (DepEd Memorandum No. 064, s. 2025). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DM_s2025_064r.pdf

Department of Education. (2026). Guidelines for the implementation of the 2026 summer remediation programs (DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2026). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/DO_s2026_010r.pdf

Education Endowment Foundation. (2021). Improving literacy in Key Stage 2 (2nd ed.). https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/literacy-ks2/

Epstein, J. L. (2011). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/report

Republic Act No. 12028. (2024). An Act Establishing an Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program and Appropriating Funds Therefor. Republic of the Philippines.

Ronfeldt, M., Farmer, S. O., McQueen, K., & Grissom, J. A. (2015). Teacher collaboration in instructional teams and student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 475–514. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215585562

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-15