Engaging Learners Across the Curriculum: A Phenomenological Exploration of Student Engagement in Grade 5 Multisubject Classrooms

Authors

  • Nancy Dallig North Eastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/vakecj57

Keywords:

student engagement, Grade 5, multisubject teaching, phenomenology, elementary education, learner participation, adaptive teaching

Abstract

Student engagement is a critical component of meaningful learning, particularly in elementary classrooms where teachers facilitate instruction across multiple subject areas. This phenomenological study explored how Grade 5 teachers experienced and interpreted student engagement in multisubject classrooms involving English, Mathematics, Science, EPP, GMRC, Araling Panlipunan, Filipino, and MAPEH. The study focused on the ways teachers recognized engagement, the challenges they encountered in sustaining learner participation, and the instructional strategies they used to respond to varying levels of interest, motivation, and involvement across subjects. Participants were purposively selected Grade 5 elementary school teachers with experience in teaching multiple learning areas. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically. Six major themes emerged: (1) engagement changes across subjects, (2) active participation grows through interactive learning, (3) familiar and contextualized lessons increase learner interest, (4) learner diversity creates uneven engagement, (5) teacher flexibility sustains classroom participation, and (6) relationships and encouragement strengthen learner involvement. Findings revealed both positive and negative dimensions of student engagement. While learners demonstrated enthusiasm in collaborative, practical, and relatable activities, teachers also reported disengagement during difficult, lengthy, or highly abstract lessons. The study highlights the importance of flexible pedagogy, differentiated instruction, contextualized learning, positive teacher–student relationships, and balanced multisubject planning in sustaining engagement among Grade 5 learners.

Student engagement is a critical component of meaningful learning, particularly in elementary classrooms where teachers facilitate instruction across multiple subject areas. This phenomenological study explored how Grade 5 teachers experienced and interpreted student engagement in multisubject classrooms involving English, Mathematics, Science, EPP, GMRC, Araling Panlipunan, Filipino, and MAPEH. The study focused on the ways teachers recognized engagement, the challenges they encountered in sustaining learner participation, and the instructional strategies they used to respond to varying levels of interest, motivation, and involvement across subjects. Participants were purposively selected Grade 5 elementary school teachers with experience in teaching multiple learning areas. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically. Six major themes emerged: (1) engagement changes across subjects, (2) active participation grows through interactive learning, (3) familiar and contextualized lessons increase learner interest, (4) learner diversity creates uneven engagement, (5) teacher flexibility sustains classroom participation, and (6) relationships and encouragement strengthen learner involvement. Findings revealed both positive and negative dimensions of student engagement. While learners demonstrated enthusiasm in collaborative, practical, and relatable activities, teachers also reported disengagement during difficult, lengthy, or highly abstract lessons. The study highlights the importance of flexible pedagogy, differentiated instruction, contextualized learning, positive teacher–student relationships, and balanced multisubject planning in sustaining engagement among Grade 5 learners.

Student engagement is a critical component of meaningful learning, particularly in elementary classrooms where teachers facilitate instruction across multiple subject areas. This phenomenological study explored how Grade 5 teachers experienced and interpreted student engagement in multisubject classrooms involving English, Mathematics, Science, EPP, GMRC, Araling Panlipunan, Filipino, and MAPEH. The study focused on the ways teachers recognized engagement, the challenges they encountered in sustaining learner participation, and the instructional strategies they used to respond to varying levels of interest, motivation, and involvement across subjects. Participants were purposively selected Grade 5 elementary school teachers with experience in teaching multiple learning areas. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically. Six major themes emerged: (1) engagement changes across subjects, (2) active participation grows through interactive learning, (3) familiar and contextualized lessons increase learner interest, (4) learner diversity creates uneven engagement, (5) teacher flexibility sustains classroom participation, and (6) relationships and encouragement strengthen learner involvement. Findings revealed both positive and negative dimensions of student engagement. While learners demonstrated enthusiasm in collaborative, practical, and relatable activities, teachers also reported disengagement during difficult, lengthy, or highly abstract lessons. The study highlights the importance of flexible pedagogy, differentiated instruction, contextualized learning, positive teacher–student relationships, and balanced multisubject planning in sustaining engagement among Grade 5 learners.

References

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369–386.

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). Springer.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE Publications.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-15

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2026): International Journal of Education, Literacies and Curriculum Studies

Section

Articles