Reimagining Literacy Recovery: Lived Experiences of Junior High School English Teachers Implementing the ARAL Program in Developing Academic Reading and Writing Competencies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/0max0e97

Keywords:

Keywords: ARAL Program, literacy recovery, academic reading, academic writing, Senior High School English teachers, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, literacy intervention, lived experiences

Abstract

The persistent decline in learners' literacy proficiency has become one of the most pressing educational concerns worldwide, particularly following the learning disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In the Philippines, the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program institutionalized through Republic Act No. 12028 represents the government's strategic response to addressing learning loss by strengthening foundational competencies, including academic reading and writing. While existing studies have extensively evaluated learners' literacy performance and intervention outcomes, limited attention has been given to the lived experiences of Junior High School English teachers of Bontoc District who serve as primary implementers of literacy recovery initiatives. Their perspectives are critical in understanding how national educational policies are translated into classroom practices that foster academic literacy among diverse learners. This phenomenological study aims to explore the lived experiences of Junior High School English teachers in implementing the ARAL Program to develop students' academic reading and writing competencies. Guided by Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), the study seeks to understand how teachers perceive their instructional roles, instructional innovations, implementation challenges, coping mechanisms, and professional meanings derived from literacy intervention. Participants will consist of purposively selected Junior High School English teachers actively implementing the ARAL Program in public secondary schools. Data will be gathered through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the interpretative procedures of Smith, Flowers, and Larkin. The study is expected to generate rich thematic descriptions that explain how teachers facilitate literacy recovery through differentiated instruction, reflective practice, collaborative engagement, and learner-centered pedagogies. Findings will contribute to the growing body of knowledge on literacy intervention, English language education, teacher professional development, and educational policy while providing evidence-based recommendations for strengthening the implementation of the ARAL Program in Philippine secondary schools.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2022). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 26(2), 97–140.

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2020). The new lives of teachers. Routledge.

Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program. Department of Education.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44.

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Republic of the Philippines. (2024). Republic Act No. 12028: Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning (ARAL) Program Act. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Snow, C. E. (2023). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 145–158.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). How to differentiate instruction in academically diverse classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education—A tool on whose terms? UNESCO Publishing.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-15