Leading Through Teachers’ Eyes: Lived Experiences and Perceptions of Teachers on School Leadership Practices in Public Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Lasier Guinumtad NorthEastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/w193sy86

Keywords:

: educational leadership, elementary teachers, lived experiences, phenomenology, rural education, school leadership, teacher perceptions, Ifugao

Abstract

School leadership is experienced most directly by teachers through everyday interactions, administrative decisions, instructional support, professional development, communication, and workplace relationships. Understanding leadership from teachers’ perspectives therefore provides important insights into how formal leadership practices are translated into everyday school experiences. This qualitative phenomenological study explores the lived experiences and perceptions of teachers regarding school leadership practices in public elementary schools in Mayoyao District, Ifugao, Philippines. Specifically, it examines how teachers experience leadership in relation to instructional support, communication and decision-making, professional development, recognition and motivation, interpersonal relationships, and responses to contextual challenges. Participants are purposively selected public elementary school teachers with sustained experience working under school-level leadership. Data are generated through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The inquiry is sensitized by contemporary perspectives on instructional, transformational, and distributed leadership and by the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH), while allowing themes to emerge from participants’ accounts. The study positions teachers not merely as recipients of leadership decisions but as knowledgeable organizational actors whose experiences reveal how leadership is enacted, negotiated, and interpreted within rural elementary-school contexts. Findings are expected to contribute to culturally and contextually responsive leadership development, teacher–leader relationships, professional support mechanisms, and school-improvement initiatives in geographically situated public-school communities.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Department of Education. (2020). National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH) (DepEd Order No. 24, s. 2020). Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Grissom, J. A., Egalite, A. J., & Lindsay, C. A. (2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation.

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

Harris, A. (2013). Distributed leadership: Friend or foe? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 41(5), 545–554.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Sun, J., & Leithwood, K. (2015). Direction-setting school leadership practices: A meta-analytical review of evidence about their influence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 499–523.

Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30