Teaching for Engagement: A Phenomenological Inquiry into TVL Pedagogical Practices and Students’ Learning Engagement in a Philippine Public Secondary School

Authors

  • MESSIAN VERDADERO Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64358/7t4bv752

Keywords:

experiential learning, lived experiences, pedagogy, phenomenology, student engagement, Technology and Livelihood Education, TVL

Abstract

Student engagement is particularly important in Technology and Livelihood Education (TVL), where meaningful learning requires students to move beyond conceptual understanding toward active participation, practical application, problem-solving, collaboration, and performance-based learning. This qualitative phenomenological study explores the lived experiences of TVL teachers in employing pedagogical practices to foster student engagement in a Philippine public secondary school. Specifically, it investigates how teachers design and facilitate learning experiences, how they perceive and respond to varying levels of behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic engagement, what challenges they encounter in sustaining participation, and how they adapt instruction to learners’ needs and contextual realities. Participants are purposively selected TVL teachers with direct experience teaching practical and competency-based subjects. Data are generated through semi-structured, in-depth interviews and analyzed using Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method. The inquiry is sensitized by constructivist, experiential, and student-engagement perspectives while allowing themes to emerge inductively from participants’ narratives. Particular attention is given to hands-on learning, demonstration and guided practice, collaborative activities, contextualization, differentiated support, learner autonomy, resource constraints, and teacher–student relationships. The study positions engagement not simply as observable participation but as a multidimensional experience shaped by pedagogy, relevance, relationships, competence, and learning conditions. Findings may inform context-responsive TVL instruction, teacher professional development, curriculum implementation, and school-level support for meaningful student participation in practical learning.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.

Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2022). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In A. L. Reschly & S. L. Christenson (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (2nd ed.). Springer.

Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-30